3  Structure Prioritization

Field Assessment Ranking Process

A primary outcome of the WCRP will be the rehabilitation of barriers to connectivity in the Horsefly River watershed. To achieve Goal 1 in this plan, it is necessary to identify a suite of barriers that, if rehabilitated, will provide access to a minimum of 14.77 km of key habitat (Table 3.1).

Table 3.1: Spawning and rearing habitat connectivity gain requirements to meet WCRP goals in the Horsefly River watershed. The measures of currently connected and total habitat values are derived from the Intrinsic Potential habitat model described in Appendix B.
Habitat Type Currently connected (km) Total (km) Current Connectivity Status Goal Gain required (km)
Spawning and Rearing 326.28 355.26 92% 96% 14.77

After all existing data and knowledge are collated for known and modelled crossings, an iterative ranking process is conducted to identify barriers for rehabilitation to meet the goals. The ranking process is primarily used to guide field assessments and maximize efficiency in ground truthing data inputs and model outputs, while providing a secondary purpose to evaluate the relative key habitat gains of confirmed barriers in the watershed. This process, combined with input from local knowledge holders and experts, is used to develop field plans for assessing structures that have the potential to block the most key habitat in the watershed. Field assessments are based on the B.C. Fish Passage Strategic Approach Environment (2014) and can include a barrier assessment (i.e., evaluating passability of the structure), a habitat confirmation (i.e., evaluation of whether the upstream habitat is suitable for the focal species and whether there are other undocumented man-made or natural barriers upstream or downstream), or a detailed habitat investigation (e.g., a fish passage study or further in-depth analysis of habitat features in a waterbody).

The ranking process accounts for the long-term and immediate habitat gains potentially offered by each structure to improve key habitat connectivity in the watershed. All structures in the watershed (excluding those confirmed as passable) are ranked in each iteration of the ranking process. Details of the ranking process used to guide field assessments can be found in Appendix C.

Structure Prioritization Results

Following field assessments, structures are placed on one of five possible lists:

  1. Priority barriers list – the structure is confirmed as a full or partial barrier, has key habitat confirmed to exist upstream, and is considered actionable by the planning team (i.e., action items will be identified to advance rehabilitation of the structure). Depending on the barrier, owner, financial constraints, and quality of upstream habitat, the action may be to leave to end of life cycle before reviewing again, remove and decommission the structure, replace with a new passable structure, or modify to temporarily restore connectivity (e.g., fish ladder or baffles installed; (Table 3.2)).

  2. Assessed structures that remain data deficient list – some form of field assessment has been completed on the structure, but further investigation is required to confirm either the passability status or presence/suitability of upstream habitat (Table 3.3).

  3. Rehabilitated barriers list – priority barriers that have been addressed either through removal, replacement, or temporary fish passage improvement projects; (Table 3.4).

  4. Non-actionable barriers list – the structure is confirmed to be a barrier to fish passage and have some amount/quality of habitat upstream, but the planning team will not identify actions to advance rehabilitation of the structure because of logistic considerations (e.g., financial costs), short habitat gain, or the upstream habitat is of poor quality or unsuitable in its present condition to support key life stages of the focal species Appendix C.

  5. Excluded structures list – the structure is excluded from further consideration in subsequent ranking and work planning because the structure is confirmed passable, not present, or there is no key habitat upstream Appendix C.

Table 3.2:

The Horsefly River watershed priority barrier list, which includes barriers that have undergone field assessment, been reviewed by the planning team, and selected to pursue for proactive rehabilitation.

Barrier Id

Modelled Crossing Id

Watercourse Name

Road Name

Structure Type

Partial Passability

Structure Owner

Num Barriers Set

Total Hab Gain Set

Upstream Habitat Quality

Estimated Cost $

Next Steps

Reason

Notes

Supporting Links

57556

6800076

Sucker Creek

Black Creek FSR

Stream crossing - CBS

Yes

MOTI

1

5.07

Medium

20000

Engage with barrier owner

Culvert passes fish but is not fully backwatered. Higher density of juveniles downstream

May just need to adjust backwater, consider replacement at end of life. Work with barrier owner to determine timeline for rehabilitation

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=1885

57507

6800089

Wilmot Creek

MOTI

Stream crossing - CBS

No

MOTI

1

2.93

Medium

400000

Commission engineering designs

High potential for use by salmon, direct connection to Horsefly mainstem

Designs in progress

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=197825

124150

6800503

Trib to Deerhorn

unnamed

Stream crossing - CBS

Unknown

Private

1

1.89

High

150000

Engage with barrier owner

Undersized culvert, fish present

Landowner says fish present

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=124330

197762

6800487

Divan Creek

unnamed

Stream crossing - Ford

No

Forest tenure

1

1.44

Low

2000

Engage with barrier owner

Industry barrier

No permitted roads to site. Talk to Tolko about potential hand removal

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=198782

124272

Trib to Woodjam Creek

Unnamed

Stream crossing - CBS

Yes

Private

1

1.15

High

150000

Engage with barrier owner

Undersized culvert, fish present

abundant fish downstream during 2017 assessment. May be passable to adults

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=197823

198300

6800483

Molybdenite Creek

West Fraser/Tolko

Stream crossing - Ford

Unknown

Forest tenure

1

0.88

High

10000

Engage with barrier owner

Industry barrier

Remove debris from collapsed bridge from stream channel. Currently a barrier at low flows

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=199520

124268

6800048

Vedder Creek

Horsefly-Quesnel Lake Road

Stream crossing - CBS

Yes

MOTI

2

0.87

High

400000

Commission engineering designs

Salmonid juveniles observed indicating high quality habitat

Designs in progress

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=124448

198876

Vedder Creek

Private

Stream crossing - CBS

Yes

Private

2

0.87

High

2000

Engage with barrier owner

Easy fix, high quality habitat

Small flexi culvert, likely could be removed by hand

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=200136

124249

6800023

Wawn Lake Creek

Millar Road

Stream crossing - CBS

Unknown

MOTI

1

0.70

Medium

400000

Engage with barrier owner

Deferred until Vedder and Wilmot complete

Currently backwatered by impassable beaver dam. Undersized

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=1882

124256

6800022

Harpers Creek

Horsefly Road

Stream crossing - CBS

No

MOTI

2

0.69

Medium

400000

Commission engineering designs

Decent rearing habitat in Harpers Lake

Designs on hold while Vedder and Wilmot addressed

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=1883

57158

6800596

Trib to McKinley Creek

R02156-887

Stream crossing - CBS

No

Forest tenure

2

0.36

High

150000

Rehabilitation

Industry barrier

Short habitat gain (wetland upstream). Poorly defined channel beyond wetland.

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=197835

126471

Trib to Woodjam Creek

unnamed

Stream crossing - CBS

Yes

FLNRO

1

0.10

Medium

20000

Engage with barrier owner

Potentially easy fix

Cattle trail, may be able to decommission or replace with small 3 m bridge. Discuss with barrier owner. Short habitat gain, parr able to pass at some flows, dewatering/ stranding potential.

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=685

57298

24708568

Trib to Bosk Lake

Black Creek-Cruiser Lake

Stream crossing - CBS

Yes

Forest tenure

1

0.08

Medium

250000

Rehabilitation

Industry barrier

Tolko aiming to replace with clearspan bridge summer 2024

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?assessmentId=197832

Table 3.3:

Assessed structures that remain data deficient

Barrier Id

Modelled Crossing Id

Watercourse Name

Road Name

Structure Type

Structure Owner

Barrier Status

Partial Passability

Assessment Type Completed

Total Hab Gain Set

Num Barriers Set

Next Steps

Notes

Supporting Links

1200000002

Patenaude Creek

Private

Stream crossing - OBS

Private

BARRIER

Informal assessment

3.62

1

Barrier assessment (data deficient structures only)

Complete barrier assessment to verify status

126438

6800525

Trib to Horsefly River

Private

Stream crossing - CBS

Private

POTENTIAL

Barrier assessment

0.85

1

Engage with barrier owner

Can't access site (landowner refusal). Brian checking with local consultant if he knows anything about the crossing. Bring to regulator if no resolution.

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=1882

1006800220

6800220

Trib to Harpers Lake

unnamed

Other

Private

POTENTIAL

Other

0.69

2

Non-actionable

57430

6801719

Gifford Creek

Hendrix-McKinley

Stream crossing - CBS

FLNRO

BARRIER

Habitat confirmation

0.02

1

In-depth habitat investigation (data deficient structures only)

Coho present downstream, some steep sections to falls, salmonids throughout to falls

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=703

124271

MacLean Creek

Private

Stream crossing - CBS

Private

BARRIER

Habitat confirmation

Engage with barrier owner

Last assessed 2017. Can't access. Brian checking with local consultant on status of crossing. Bring in regulator if no resolution

http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/pscismap/imageViewer.do?habitatConfirmationId=681

Table 3.4:

Rehabilitated structures.

Barrier Id

Modelled Crossing Id

Watercourse Name

Road Name

Type Of Rehabilitation

Rehabilitated By

Rehabilitated Date

Total Hab Gain Set

Actual Project Cost $

Next Steps

Notes

Supporting Links

126511

6800263

Trib to Horsefly River

unnamed

Replacement - OBS

Tolko

2023-01-01

2.21

N/A - project complete (rehabilitated structures only)

Culvert removed from under bridge

126594

6801993

Niquidet Creek

R17330-730

Replacement - OBS

Tolko

2023-01-01

0.35

N/A - project complete (rehabilitated structures only)

Crossing replaced with clearspan bridge

57168

24708567

Boscar Lake Creek

Black Creek-Cruiser Lake

Removal/decommissioned

CWF

2022-01-01

94613

N/A - project complete (rehabilitated structures only)

Originally priced for a bridge, was decommissioned instead, hence major difference between estimated rehab and actual rehab costs.

https://cwf-fcf.org/en/resources/downloads/pdf/2021-2022-Projects-Technical-Briefing.pdf